<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>thought is creative</title><link>http://earwigoagain.blog.co.uk/</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://earwigoagain.blog.co.uk/feed/rss2/posts/"/><description></description><language>en-EU</language><generator>MokoFeed</generator><ttl>10</ttl><item><title>think again</title><link>http://earwigoagain.blog.co.uk/2006/03/08/think_again~623565/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:earwigoagain.blog.co.uk,2006-03-08:/2006/03/08/think_again~623565/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:23:58 +0100</pubDate><description>	&lt;p&gt;seriously&lt;br&gt;
Just realised what a great danger exists here in Bloggoland ( which is a new place to me)&lt;br&gt;
Already I have taken myself seriously twice - but I don't care !!!!&lt;br&gt;
I am mouselike in my playing during the feline absence.&lt;br&gt;
I can say anything I want here. Can't I ?&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;What I notice something about approval. I want to sound SMART or enlightened .&lt;br&gt;
And is this whole thing not just&lt;br&gt;
" the latest form of technomasterbation for a race of screen -gazing gangoozlers gormandizing themselves as a remedy for a boredom that is contiguous with the pointless contusion of meaninglessness"........... as I said to Roger .&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;So my thought for today is - " It is ok for me express myself freely"&lt;br&gt;
too clever.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://earwigoagain.blog.co.uk/2006/03/08/think_again~623565/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><comments>http://earwigoagain.blog.co.uk/2006/03/08/think_again~623565/#comments</comments></item><item><title>thinks</title><link>http://earwigoagain.blog.co.uk/2006/03/08/thinks~623558/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:earwigoagain.blog.co.uk,2006-03-08:/2006/03/08/thinks~623558/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:21:49 +0100</pubDate><description>	&lt;p&gt;The nature of truth.&lt;br&gt;
Consensus - if we all believe it to be true , is it ?&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Creative thoughts defining the Truth ?&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Wikipedia - I have just discovered. It is an on- line encyclopedia of a new type , an " open source technology " which means that information and articles can be read , then edited or altered by the reader. And this obviosly brings up loads of questions about the validity or reliability of the information and how much you can trust it. But we tend to trust sources like the good ol reliable Brittanica without question.&lt;br&gt;
All of a sudden the firm foundations of truth on which we base our lives become questionable.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Try this link :-&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2010-1025-5979331.html?tag=tb"&gt;http://news.com.com/2010-1025-5979331.html?tag=tb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
this link goes to the centre of a debate on the nature of TRUTH&lt;br&gt;
Specifically - in relation to WIKIPEDIA - &lt;a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/"&gt;http://www.wikipedia.org/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://earwigoagain.blog.co.uk/2006/03/08/thinks~623558/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><comments>http://earwigoagain.blog.co.uk/2006/03/08/thinks~623558/#comments</comments></item></channel></rss>
